<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Content Marketers Making A Mistake With Opt-in Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/15/content-marketers-making-mistake-with-optin-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/15/content-marketers-making-mistake-with-optin-content/</link>
	<description>Web Content Writing, Blog Writing, Digital Custom Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:44:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/15/content-marketers-making-mistake-with-optin-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11633</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reallypractical.com/?p=565#comment-11633</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a difficult balancing act for me. On the one hand I always here &quot;the money&#039;s in the list&quot; so I feel some pressure to build an opt-in list at every turn. On the other, I get your point about barriers. I guess my best course of action is to test and see which produces better results in my target market. 

And then there&#039;s always the issue of how useful the opt-in ends up being. Between bounced messages, opt-outs, and just plain ignored messages, how many people even read my email anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a difficult balancing act for me. On the one hand I always here &#8220;the money&#8217;s in the list&#8221; so I feel some pressure to build an opt-in list at every turn. On the other, I get your point about barriers. I guess my best course of action is to test and see which produces better results in my target market. </p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s always the issue of how useful the opt-in ends up being. Between bounced messages, opt-outs, and just plain ignored messages, how many people even read my email anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Media Buzz - Are Content Marketers Making A Mistake With Opt-in Content? &#124; Digital Media Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/15/content-marketers-making-mistake-with-optin-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11590</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Media Buzz - Are Content Marketers Making A Mistake With Opt-in Content? &#124; Digital Media Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reallypractical.com/?p=565#comment-11590</guid>
		<description>[...] As you can tell from the quote above (as reported on Techcrunch) Chris Anderson, Wired Editor-in-Chief and author of The Long Tail, likes the word ‘free’. His latest book is entitled Free: The Future of a Radical Price and his speech at Wired’s Disruptive By Design conference touched on what free means for the media industry&#8230;&#8230;..[read entire story] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As you can tell from the quote above (as reported on Techcrunch) Chris Anderson, Wired Editor-in-Chief and author of The Long Tail, likes the word ‘free’. His latest book is entitled Free: The Future of a Radical Price and his speech at Wired’s Disruptive By Design conference touched on what free means for the media industry&#8230;&#8230;..[read entire story] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
