<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Much Should You Be Paying for Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/23/how-much-should-you-be-paying-for-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/23/how-much-should-you-be-paying-for-content/</link>
	<description>Web Content Writing, Blog Writing, Digital Custom Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:44:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nagurski</title>
		<link>http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/23/how-much-should-you-be-paying-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11734</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nagurski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reallypractical.com/?p=572#comment-11734</guid>
		<description>Hi James

Not sure if I fully get the question but it&#039;s not uncommon to see article writers offering their services at these sorts of prices for &#039;unique&#039; content. Although I can&#039;t speak for any individual writer it seems that they are offering full copyright ownership rather than first rights or repurposed work (which would make the price a little more understandable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James</p>
<p>Not sure if I fully get the question but it&#8217;s not uncommon to see article writers offering their services at these sorts of prices for &#8216;unique&#8217; content. Although I can&#8217;t speak for any individual writer it seems that they are offering full copyright ownership rather than first rights or repurposed work (which would make the price a little more understandable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James H</title>
		<link>http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/23/how-much-should-you-be-paying-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11704</link>
		<dc:creator>James H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reallypractical.com/?p=572#comment-11704</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question -- are these ridiculously low rates works for hire?  If you&#039;re only selling first electronic rights, then is a low price appropriate?  And what if they&#039;re willing to accept repurposed work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question &#8212; are these ridiculously low rates works for hire?  If you&#8217;re only selling first electronic rights, then is a low price appropriate?  And what if they&#8217;re willing to accept repurposed work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum</title>
		<link>http://www.reallypractical.com/2009/06/23/how-much-should-you-be-paying-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11603</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reallypractical.com/?p=572#comment-11603</guid>
		<description>Great article.

As a Copywriter, I&#039;ve noticed the increase in these &#039;bidding&#039; sites and must say, they seem nothing but desperate, underqualified people hawking for a fast buck.  I still believe that quality speaks for itself and hopefully clients will realise this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
<p>As a Copywriter, I&#8217;ve noticed the increase in these &#8216;bidding&#8217; sites and must say, they seem nothing but desperate, underqualified people hawking for a fast buck.  I still believe that quality speaks for itself and hopefully clients will realise this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

